Challenging DWI Charges: What You Should Know

Getting arrested for a DWI raises many questions and elicits considerable worry, particularly with respect to the potentially steep criminal and administrative penalties that accompany such a conviction.

For those who wish to fight charges, here is a list of the most successful and common ways to challenge a DWI.

Challenge the Legality of the Stop

Police must have some type of reasonable suspicion to pull over a motorist. Most DWI stops are the result of infractions such as:

  • Weaving in and out of traffic
  • Following too closely
  • Driving above or below the speed limit
  • Driving on the shoulder
  • Having a burned-out light or turn signal
  • Traveling the wrong way on a one-way street
  • Making a wrong turn
  • Failing to observe a traffic light or stop sign

Whatever the reason, the police officer must state a clear and reasonable cause for the traffic stop in the first place, and this information should also be noted on the incident or arrest report. If the stop were illegal, then any evidence obtained during the subsequent investigation is inadmissible.

Challenge Breathalyzer Results

Having suspected drunk drivers blow into a breathalyzer is standard practice for identifying whether a person’s blood alcohol content (BAC) is above the legal limit; however, these tests oftentimes have flawed results. Among the most cited reasons for false breathalyzer results include:

  • Equipment malfunction
  • Poor or improper maintenance and calibration
  • User error
  • Driver’s health conditions
  • Driver’s use of over-the-counter products such as mouthwash which may provide an erroneous high BAC reading

Challenge Blood/Urine Tests

Similar to challenging breathalyzer tests, a driver facing DWI charges can also question the result of other chemical tests. These tests can also yield incorrect results, particularly with an inexperienced or unqualified tester, if the equipment used is poorly maintained, or if there are chain-of-custody problems during the testing process.

Question the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Field Sobriety Tests

In addition to questioning the legitimacy of chemical BAC tests, many field sobriety tests that require the suspected driver perform certain fine motor skills assessments have also been proven rather unreliable because there are several factors which may lead to poor performance on said tests. Among these factors are weather, restrictive clothing, having a physical illness, weight, or naturally poor coordination.

Demonstrate the Illegality of a DWI Checkpoint Arrest

DWI checkpoints continue to raise controversy with respect to potential Fourth Amendment violations; however, law enforcement agencies continue to use them. The entire process must adhere to certain protocols such as a uniform selecting procedure, ensuring driver safety, and maintaining motorists’ constitutional rights. Any doubt surrounding these factors may result in case dismissal.

Assert a Police Officer’s Failure to Provide Implied Consent Warnings

In many states—including Minnesota—implied consent laws require motorists suspected of DWI submit to a chemical BAC test or risk suspension of their driver’s license and/or other penalties. Officers must request a suspected driver to submit to a test; they may not demand or use coercive or threatening behavior to obtain a sample. Inappropriate behavior by police oftentimes ensures that any test results are inadmissible.

Claim Police Officer Misconduct

A central tenet of contemporary law enforcement is informing a criminal suspect about his/her Miranda rights: the right not to make incriminating statements and to have access to an attorney. Police are legally bound to administer these warnings before questioning a suspect, and if an officer fails to Mirandize a suspect, then any evidence obtained from this improper questioning is inadmissible. Similarly, if an officer stops a motorist based on racial or ethnic profiling, any evidence obtained as a result is likely to be inadmissible.

Dispute Being Under the Influence in the First Place

In some cases, an individual may have a particular medical condition, suffer from legal medication side-effects, or have some other condition that may lead police to erroneously believe s/he was under the influence.

For more information, or if you or a loved one are facing DWI charges, please contact us.

Disclaimer: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

  • Should be Empty:
  • Client Testimonials

    To meet your needs, I provide 24 hour service, off-site appointments, and a free initial consultation. Contact my Minneapolis law office to have a knowledgeable criminal defense attorney on your side.

    See More Client Testimonials
    Quote

    Case Results

    Best Minneapolis Criminal Defense Lawyer Representation

    Controlled substance in the 3rd degree

    County: Hennepin

    Type of Charge: Controlled substance in the 3rd degree

    Priors: None

    Final Deposition: Amended to 5th degree

    Sentence Imposed: Felony kept off the record and no jail

    Felony Strangulation

    County: Hennepin

    Type of Charge: Felony Strangulation

    Priors: 2 domestic Assaults

    Final Deposition: Gross Misdemeanor sentence

    Sentence Imposed: 30 days on electronic monitoring

    Felony Arson

    County: Hennepin

    Type of Charge: Felony Arson

    Priors: No priors

    Final Deposition: Sentenced as a gross misdemeanor

    Sentence Imposed: No jail

    View More Criminal Defense Case Results

    Contact Attorney Judith Samson

    Over 20 years experienced criminal defense representation in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
    Our office is located in downtown Minneapolis in the Flour Exchange Building.

    310 4th Ave S, Suite 1050, Minneapolis, MN 55415

    Phone: 612-333-8001

    Fax: 612-333-8003